Alchemy Academy no longer supports Internet Explorer 11, preventing you from accessing certain features. Download one of these great browsers and you’ll be good to go:

Posted on

Food Defense 101: The Three Types of Food Defense Threat Motivations

Food_Defense

Intentional adulteration is only carried out after careful study and preparation by an attacker – is your food defense program equally prepared to address such acts? Motivation, capability, and vulnerability come together to compose food defense threats. Motivation often determines the adulterant and tactics that a perpetrator chooses to use. In addition to the threat itself, you must understand these potential drives for adulteration to help you address vulnerabilities in your process and keep the food system secure.

The three most prominent food defense threat motivations include:

  • Terrorism
  • Sabotage
  • Economically Motivated Adulteration or EMA




Terrorism

Terrorism against the food system occurs to cause fear, public health harm, or social and economic disruption. A terrorist may add toxic chemicals or a microbial pathogen directly to food set for public distribution.

Sabotage

Disgruntled employees, consumers, or competitors may or may not intend to cause public health harm but may seek to harm a company’s reputation through recalls when they carry out intentional adulteration. Each of these instances is an example of sabotage.

Dissatisfied employees represent intelligent adversaries with special access to and knowledge of your food production process and food defense program. This familiarity with your facility, procedures, security, and preventive control measures makes them of heightened concern. Consumers and extreme activists often carry out or threaten attacks on the food system to highlight a cause, such as using products thought to cause environmental harm.

Economically Motivated Adulteration

You may have heard EMA referred to as food fraud. This example of motivation involves the intention to make money fraudulently, evade regulation, or gain an unfair economic advantage.

There are multiple EMA methods, such as substituting expensive ingredients with cheaper ones to increase profit, adding unapproved ingredients to increase taste or volume, or mislabeling ingredients to avoid tariffs.

Conclusion

Individuals who commit intentional adulteration are creative, adaptable, and resourceful. Consider the three types of motivation and how to prevent and address them when creating your food defense program. To learn more about food defense threats, roles, and what happens after intentional adulteration occurs in a facility, consider Alchemy Academy’s Food Defense Supervisor online course.

leadership
ARTICLE

Six Core Competencies of Leadership

Chances are you’re starting this year intent on making it your best year ever. Maybe you’ve resolved to lose 20 pounds, take up the banjo, or accomplish any other goal you’ve long dreamed of checking off. Achieving these personal goals is, as they say, “all you,” but how does the “best you” translate to the […]



Read More
crisis management simulation
ARTICLE

Food Safety Crisis Management Simulation: A New Way to Train

Around the world, food safety has transformed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. On the edge of a hopeful new year, crisis management planning has risen to the forefront of the food industry. Businesses know that a plan must be in a place that dictates how they will respond to critical situations that could […]



Read More
SQF Practitioner
ARTICLE

How Do I Become an SQF Practitioner

Under the Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code, every SQF-certified company must appoint an SQF Practitioner. Your company designated you as their SQF Practitioner. But what does an SQF Practitioner do, and what are the requirements for becoming an official SQF Practitioner? What is an SQF Practitioner? The SQF Practitioner is responsible for monitoring the development […]



Read More